Obama’s Next Big Mistake

Back in 1994, my undergrad mentor commented to me that Bill Clinton was making a serious error in “nationalizing” the midterm elections. By “nationalizing,” he meant making them a referendum on himself. That was just one of many instances where I wasn’t convinced at first, but later came to realize my mentor had a considerable amount of political wisdom.

I see Barack Obama making the same mistake. The Republicans are, as a matter of course, trying to make the elections a referendum on Obama because as the sitting president, the perpetual #1 issue for voters–the economy–can politically be laid at his feet. Obama would be wise to try to try to downplay the referendum aspect, but instead he seems to be accepting it.

In electoral politics, it’s always crucial to remember the words of Tip O’Neill: All politics is local. If you nationalize the election, the issue becomes, “How do the locals feel about Obama?” At present, polls by Gallup, Rasmussen, CNN, and Quinnipiac all show the President with approval ratings below 50%. In parliamentary systems, where every election is a referendum on the current government, Prime Ministers generally try to avoid calling elections when their approval rating is below the percentage they need for electoral success.

Obama’s effort is not precisely stupid. He’s not saying, “Hey, don’t you think I’m great,” but “Hey, it’s the Republicans who caused this mess, so you don’t want to go back to that, do you?” But the effort is not precisely wise, either, because it still keeps the focus on the economy, which does him no good at all.

What Obama should be doing is publicly pointing out that it’s not about him, it’s about “your local candidate.” He needs to pinpoint the Democratic candidates in need, particularly incumbents, and put massive efforts into supporting their campaigns, but without making himself the focus of the campaign. He should never go to a campaign event and say, “I need this guy in Washington,” but “He is a great man,* who’s working hard to do X, Y, and Z for you.” Or he should just help them raise vast amounts of cash, and then just stay the hell out of their district unless polling shows that a majority of the non-party-registered folks in that district approve of him.

He’ll say great things about the candidates of course. But he’ll probably also show up where he shouldn’t, talk about himself too much, and inevitably make people think that their vote is about Obama, about the Democrats in Washington, and about the poor state of the economy. In other words, he’ll almost certainly bungle things and make it a referendum on Barack Obama.

He’ll do that because while he’s a sharp and clever campaigner, he doesn’t seem to be wise. And he doesn’t seem to be wise because he seems to personalize everything too much–something wise people don’t do.** Of course it takes a phenomenal ego to successfully run for the presidency. And it’s hard for those with such an ego to let go, sit back, and not take center stage.

But as I tell my students in my course on strategic behavior, a strategic person sets aside personal feelings of satisfaction in order to focus on those actions that will achieve their real goal.*** (And if the real goal is just that personal feeling of satisfaction, you’re missing the whole point.) Whether Obama can recognize the need to do that, and whether he actually can discipline himself to do it, are two separate questions. Each has to be answered in the affirmative if he is to make the right strategic choices between now and November.
*She/woman, etc. Isn’t it about time someone cleverer than I came up with a good gender-neutral singular pronoun?
**Note: I’m not claiming to say this as a wise person myself. It’s a quality that I have observed unanimously among the people I consider to have wisdom. That I occasionally manage to emulate it does not mean I have become wise myself.
***Don’t look at me like that. You know the old saying: “Those who can, do. Those can’t, teach.”


About J@m3z Aitch

J@m3z Aitch is a two-bit college professor who'd rather be canoeing.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Obama’s Next Big Mistake

  1. I am seeing 94 all over again. But let’s remember that while Clinton lost the battle he won the war. The economy recovered and he won in 96. Unless the Tea Party people have some real substance, and most of it does not seem to, it will peter out the same way the Contract With America did. It is a shame to because it started as a principled stand against statism and has been highjacked by the establishment. Maybe not and we will see but it looks to be going that way.

  2. James Hanley says:


    I was entirely in agreement with your comment until the penultimate paragraph.

  3. I am talking about the Ron Paul/Libertarian wing of the movement that I believe started it. Not the Dick Armey and Bachman wing that much of the time makes me want to puke that jumped on the bandwagon.

  4. James K says:

    James, I’d recommend using “they” as a singular gender-neutral pronoun. It’s a lot easier to use than some of the constructed pronouns because it’s already recognisable, and works well.

  5. Eric says:

    This was one of the best posts I have read on the subject. I just found your web site while I was in the middle of doing some research with google. Just felt the urge to tell you I liked your web site and continue doin what youre doing. Remember, enjoy the climb… don’t focus so much on the final destination. Yours, Eric

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s